Joint–Not-Central–Planning for All DC Public Schools

Stay Updated With The Latest News

NACSA is committed to sharing regular updates on the latest federal COVID-19 information available in an effort to highlight education policies taking place during the pandemic. Primarily, these updates will focus on the latest packages Congress is considering and guidance from the U.S. Department of Education.

Joint–Not-Central–Planning for All DC Public Schools

In the second post of a two-part series, Scott Pearson, Executive Director of the D.C. Public Charter School Board, addresses another big question raised in Emma Brown’s recent article on charter school growth in the nation’s capital: joint planning. Pearson says that “everyone in the city, from residents to public officials, supports the idea of more joint education planning.” But, he asks, “what do we mean by planning?”

If, explains Pearson, planning means asking and answering questions like “what kind of schools are needed?; Where?;” and “How can we create more high-performing schools that serve all students?” then the Public Charter School Board supports it. What it can’t support, he says, is central planning–planning as a means of protecting some schools from competition and other means of rigging the system to maintain the monopoly. “’Protecting’” an existing school from competition by keeping out new entrants from locating nearby makes little sense,” argues Pearson.  “Competition builds quality and strengthens neighborhoods.”


‘Protecting’” an existing school from competition by keeping out new entrants from locating nearby makes little sense. Competition builds quality and strengthens neighborhoods.”

     -Scott Pearson, Executive Director, D.C. Public Charter School Board

Pearson argues that “rather than capping charter growth, we should consider how charters and [DC Public Schoos] together can continue attracting more families to public schools in the District.


Rather than focus our energies walling off places schools can’t go, we should be working to get more great schools to locate in those neighborhoods most in need of more quality seats.   Let’s identify places we need great schools, and then offer facilities to our highest performing schools to open there.

      -Scott Pearson, Executive Director, D.C. Public Charter School Board

This kind of joint planning, he argues “is different from central planning.   Joint planning takes a system built around competition and choice and seeks to optimize it.  Central planning allocates resources based on a single perspective of what is best for the city.”

Pearson calls for the kind of joint planning that “can improve choices and efficiency, while preserving the autonomies and competition that have done so much to improve public schooling in the District.  We are eager to engage in this process with our partners in the city, and to hear more from community members about how best this process can serve them.”


Most Recent Posts
Holding Up a Mirror: What to Expect at 2021 NACSA Virtual Leadership Conference for Charter School Authorizers
As educators, we need to recognize the significance of this moment for charter school authorizers. The pandemic has interrupted schooling for millions of children–widening achievement and opportunity gaps that we...
Wyoming Gets a New Authorizer Is the Headline, But There’s More to the Story
Last month we touched on a Wyoming bill, SF130, which created a new authorizing pathway in the state. But there is more to the bill that deserves to be highlighted: through a comprehensive overhaul, SF130...
Amid Change, Our Autonomy and Community Are Our Strength
This blog post was written by Dr. Sana Shaikh, who served until this spring as Director of School Operations at Rise Prep High School, an autonomous school in Springfield, Massachusetts. Rise...